Saturday, September 26, 2015

CREATION-DINO'S EASY, TOP TEN LIST OF SURE-FIRE RESPONSES TO ANTAGONISTIC ATHEISTS WHO MOCK CREATIONISTS

All images and quotes used via the Fair Use Act.

It's time people with God on their side put on God's suit of armor a bit more. Go out and tell the world the truth, because if anyone mocks you, you now have this list of responses to shut them down cold, and inspire and influence others to both know the Truth and then tell the Truth. If they mock the fact that you are using template responses, say "You do it all the time when you quote a so-called scientific expert." This Top 10 List  of proven responses is your 16-inch debating gun ammo to to sink the internet cardboard battleships of those who strike first at you and your faith. Use this list all the time.

                                                                     ****************

1. WHEN INSULTING YOU, Generally, using links to mainstreamscience articles (This is your  "checkmate response 1" so always keep it handy)


RESPONSE: Another "scientific authority"? Like the paleontologists who said dinosaurs were slow and cold-blooded for 80 years when the slow-moving descriptions they used to describe dinosaurs showed they understood metabolism, endothermy and ectothermy well enough to know that the dinosaurs must have been warm blooded? They either lied or were stupid, all of them, for over 80 years, and what you are posting shows the same pattern today. The scientific community cannot be trusted to tell the truth. It's been proven by the last 100 years of historical record 


1893  Chicago World's fair,- Slow, ectothermic (cold-blooded) reconstruction of "Brontosaurus"(from author's collection),  


1964 - Same ectothermic-style reconstruction in 1964. 72 years later, based on "latest scientific evidence". NO CHANGE (from author's collection)



2. INSULT: You believe in an invisible man.

RESPONSE: There are over 7 billion people on the earth. Do you believe that all those people are invisible just because you can't see them?





3. INSULT:  You are just a crazy/stupid/ignorant/whatever.

RESPONSE: (This is  "checkmate response 2" so always keep it handy)
 I wonder what kind of loser sits at his or her computer all day and evening antagonizing people they do not know? Must be because of this-->  https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/your-online-secrets/201409/internet-trolls-are-narcissists-psychopaths-and-sadists    Are your friends and family proud of you? 


Image from Psychology Today about internet psychopaths, used via the Fair Use Act.




4. INSULT: You believe in a giant man in the sky.

RESPONSE: That is not how the Bible describes God. Get past your 1950's first-grade reader and images in art, no matter how well-respected. Besides, I wonder what kind of loser sits at his or her computer all day and evening antagonizing people they do not know? Must be because of this--> https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/your-online-secrets/201409/internet-trolls-are-narcissists-psychopaths-and-sadists   Are your friends and family proud of you?







5. INSULT: You are not being very gracious and Jesus-like when you say that. My, my, you are not a good Christian to talk that way.

RESPONSE: Jesus turned over the tables of the money changers and drove them out with a whip of cords. You should be lucky I am not more Jesus-like when it comes to you.  I wonder what kind of loser sits at his or her computer all day and evening antagonizing people they do not know? Must be because of this-->  https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/your-online-secrets/201409/internet-trolls-are-narcissists-psychopaths-and-sadists   Are your friends and family proud of you?


Jesus drives out the money changers with a whip of cords, as described in the Bible



6. INSULT: Science says you are wrong, you crazy loon

RESPONSELike the paleontologists who said dinosaurs were slow and cold-blooded for 80 years when the slow-moving descriptions they used to describe dinosaurs showed they understood metabolism, endothermy and ectothermy well enough to know that the dinosaurs must have been warm blooded? They either lied or were stupid, all of them, for over 80 years, and what you are posting shows the same pattern today. The scientific community cannot be trusted to tell the truth. It's been proven by the last 100 years of historical record 







7. INSULT: Hey idiot, the fossil record proves evolution.

RESPONSE: No, it does not. Evolution needs mutation to be a viable theory, which is a chaotic process, so there should be a ton of fossils of the mutations which did not succeed, demanded by statistics because we have many fossils of single animals, but no fossil record of the billions of mutations which did not succeed. 


In most ways, evolutionists still present this pathetic and insulting basic idea of evolution, made 'substantial" by innumerable theories, hypothesis and, ultimately, non sequitur. 



8. INSULT: Hey moron, radiometric dating proves fossils are millions of years old.

RESPONSE: Radiometric dating as been proven so fallible that samples 50 years old have been dated at millions of years. It's so bad most labs won't even accept a sample to date anymore unless you tell them so much about it that you practically run the dating test yourself.





9. INSULT: Hey fairy tale believer, the human race is proven to be hundreds of thousands of years old.

RESPONSE: Then why are there only 5,500 years of recorded human history? Recording human history was a human invention, not a human discovery. What took everyone so long to start, and once they began, why did they instantly being writing of politics and philosophy but had not even begun basic written language? Plainly humankind was created fully formed, intelligent and aware starting with the first man, which science just very recently, due to the genetic evidence, admitted began the human race less than a very recent 100,000 years ago, many times closer to the date of Biblical creation than secular science has admitted in the last 80 years. 




10: INSULT,: Hey YEC idiot, Distant Starlight proves that the universe is billions of years old because light cannot travel faster than 186,000 miles per second.

RESPONSE: The problem witgh distant starlight is that part of relativity called Gravitational Time Dilation. Only in a vacuum with no gravitation because light is comprised of photons which are matter, and gravity distorts the time of all matter.  Time has been measured by atomic clocks to run at different speeds from the gravitational difference between the surface of the earth and an atomic clock in an airplane. Imagine the time distortions among all the billions of island galaxies in the universe! To see light from earth and place a timeframe on it is like trying to navigate with a GPS using only one satellite. The advantage that mainstream science has in that analogy is that science does not need to prove the viability of the system by actually getting anywhere - they can pronounce themselves the experts and their opinions as facts and expect everyone to simply nod their heads, but the methodology of calculating the age of the universe from distant starlight is ridiculous.  Even the secular science "Big Bang Theory" falls apart because of its assumptions that would otherwise substantiate their argument against creationists using distant starlight. That problem is is called the "Horizon Problem".


A lovely little secular science diagram of one way gravity effects time - even when it relates to the speed of light. There are billions of gravity-causing island galaxies and countless phenomena that renders the idea of distant starlight as a completely implausible as reason to assume that the universe is old.

A typical mainstream science description of the very problem, involving, specifically, the Big Bang theory, that destroys their assumptions of Distant Starlight as an answer for an Old Universe. 


If they tell you to prove any of the science you cite, tell them to disprove it. They will need to cite a scientific source and you can shut them with this response, again.

Like the paleontologists who said dinosaurs were slow and cold-blooded for 80 years when the slow-moving descriptions they used to describe dinosaurs showed they understood metabolism, endothermy and ectothermy well enough to know that the dinosaurs must have been warm blooded? They either lied or were stupid, all of them, for over 80 years, and what you are posting shows the same pattern today. The scientific community cannot be trusted to tell the truth. It's been proven by the last 100 years of historical record 


ADDITIONAL Follow up INSULT to any response, above): You are an idiot, bla bla bla. They cannot win at insulting you as long as you do this. Eventually, the people who support their view will quietly tell them to leave you alone, because when you expose one of them enough with this, you expose them all..

RESPONSE:  I wonder what kind of loser sits at his or her computer all day and evening antagonizing people they do not know? Must be because of this-->    https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/your-online-secrets/201409/internet-trolls-are-narcissists-psychopaths-and-sadists   Are your friends and family proud of you? 




THIS IS TOTALLY EASY. That's all there is to it. That's all you need. It's that simple. I have tried them all. If they continue to attack, just keep posting the trolling article from Psychology Today until their friends and families start to abandon them. It's that simple. You, the Creationist, wins every time and you should.

If you have already have a proven retort that work for you, post it in comments section, below, and if they work for us or seem like they should, then we'll add them here, so join in!

God Bless and keep up the good fight in God's name.



If you like what you see and read on CreationDino, please help us continue our work as well as additional installments of the video Behold Now Behemoth by giving a "Christian Payment Offering" for the dollar amount of your choice with the dropdown menu on the Paypal button on the upper right hand side of the screen for what you read and watch on CreationDino. We could really use the help right about now.

No comments:

Post a Comment